Editorial policy

Practical guidance with visible limits.

HairChanger content should help a reader ask better questions, compare options, and recognize when a qualified professional needs to make the final assessment.

Our editorial pages are product-adjacent educational content. They are not medical, dermatological, legal, financial, or individualized salon advice.

Editorial standards

Six rules for every guide.

These standards apply to hairstyle, color, face-shape, photo, consultation, and product guidance.

01

Useful before exhaustive

Each page should answer the practical question first, then explain the details needed for a better decision.

02

Clear about limitations

A preview is never presented as proof of salon feasibility, medical suitability, or an exact real-world result.

03

Specific rather than generic

Guides use named style controls, consultation language, maintenance considerations, and concrete photo advice.

04

Source higher-risk claims

Safety, health, allergy, and platform instructions should use relevant primary or authoritative sources.

05

Correct visible errors

Material factual errors are corrected and the modified date is updated when a page changes substantially.

06

Protect editorial trust

Commercial calls to action do not change the basic conclusion or remove important limitations.

Who creates and reviews the content

Product and guide pages are prepared for the HairChanger Editorial Team. Product claims are checked against the current app feature catalogue and implementation. Style guidance is reviewed for clarity, usefulness, internal consistency, and appropriate limitations before publication.

HairChanger does not currently claim that every article has been medically reviewed or reviewed by a licensed cosmetologist. When specialized professional review has not occurred, the page should not imply that it has.

How AI assistance may be used

AI tools may assist with outlining, language refinement, content comparison, or identifying missing questions. They do not replace the editorial check. Published pages should be reviewed for factual accuracy, duplication, unsupported claims, consistency with the actual product, and a useful human reading experience.

Source selection

For product behavior, the current app and backend implementation are the primary reference. For Apple billing, subscriptions, and refunds, official Apple documentation is preferred. For cosmetic safety or allergy topics, government health sources and product instructions are preferred over unsourced lifestyle claims.

External sources are linked in the relevant guide when they materially support a claim. A source link does not mean the source endorses HairChanger.

Product images and generated examples

App screenshots represent the product interface. Hairstyle, color, beard, makeup, face-analysis, and outfit images may be generated examples. They are labeled and described as planning references, not verified salon outcomes or endorsements by the people pictured.

Commercial relationship

HairChanger publishes content that can lead readers to the HairChanger app. That relationship should be clear. Editorial pages do not accept undisclosed payment for rankings or recommendations. If sponsored or affiliate content is introduced later, it should be labeled on the page.

Corrections and updates

A material correction should update the page's modified date. Small spelling or formatting changes may not. Readers can report a suspected error by emailing [email protected] . Include the page address and the statement that needs review.

Last reviewed

This editorial policy was last reviewed on July 16, 2026.